Centre for Research in Social Policy
Loughborough University
Leicestershire, UK, LE11 3TU
Tel: +44 (0)1509 223372/223618
children and families
CRSP logo

Publications

About Us
Projects
Publications
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
Research Report Series
Annual Reports
Briefings
How to Order
News
Links
Staff
Conferences
Contact Us
Intranet - restricted
Home

Search

A Review of Poverty Dynamics Research in the UK

Poverty Dynamics  

 

Smith, N. and Middleton, S. (2007) A Review of Poverty Dynamics Research in the UK, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Price: Free

ISBN: 978 1 85935 577 0

122 pages

Download full report (378kb)

Findings pdf icon (81kb)

Further information is available from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation website.

Poverty Dynamics project page


A Review of Poverty Dynamics Research in the UK

Dynamics research presents a dramatically more comprehensive understanding of poverty than point-in-time studies. While point-in-time studies provide a static ‘snap shot’ of the population at a given single moment, dynamics or longitudinal research traces the same individuals or households over time and so is able to record stories of change. Research on poverty dynamics in the UK has taken root since the 1990s. This study aimed to gather and reflect on existing poverty dynamics literature in order to:

  • examine the different forms of poverty, how different social groups experience it, and how people enter and leave poverty;
  • understand the implications for policy aimed at tackling poverty and disadvantage; and
  • highlight priorities for further research.

The researchers conclude that the concept of ‘the poor’ given by point-in-time studies is misleading: poverty dynamics finds a broad population with diverse experiences of poverty, reveals who moves in and out of poverty and why, and sheds light on how life chances are stacked against certain individuals and families. However, there appears to be no clear understanding of poverty dynamics in current UK social policy. Progress to eradicate poverty has been held back by a failure to target persistent poverty and to safeguard against re-entry to poverty.

 

 

top

 

 

 
Website maintained by S.Walker@lboro.ac.uk